Beancounter
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,378
- Reaction score
- 1,817
Very good points Sparrowhawk. Took some time to look through the F&H portfolio. One name jumped out- Todd Jewitt. Todd was formerly on the USAirways payroll, and we had to deal with him on numerous contract issues, bid issues in the past. He is now working with Glass. I have been convinced for a long time that LOA 93 was drawn up by Glass and Co. long before the bankruptcy issues came to the fore. The elements of it were not drawn up at the last minute, and were crafted prior to the opportunity presented itself to lay it on hard. LOA 93 is far too deep reaching to have been a last minute write up. It is far, too reaching. So, if Glass is on the payroll as a consultant, you are correct. It would take a unified group to take him on effectively. He absolutely thrives in this environment, and will exploit it as would Patton exploit an enemies confusion in the field of battle. He has exactly what he had for the last battle, a divided group. He will prevail in this environment. The only way to defeat him, and this is what you have to do, go to war with him, is to unify. There is absolutely no other way. The only way you will reach a quick an decent deal is if they want to merge or do a deal here, and need a quick settlement to get their cash. The move for clarification by Parker was in the Glass playbook. No matter what either east or west thinks, this was a pure stall job.
While I agree Parker is happy having you at LOA 93 wages, I disagree that he doesn't want one pilot group. He wants another merger and having one pilot group will help to bring in outside capital and if the snapback clause is gone he doesn't have to have to worry about calling an acquisition a merger. Parker isn't trying to stall by going to the courts, he just can read. The 9th said USAPA is free to negotiate as long as it is in good faith. Parker and US Airways legal department isn't stupid. If they mess with the Nic the suite is ripe. Is the Nic fair? No, it was a total windfall for guys like me and your senior pilots. I can't change that list though and I'm sorry but I don't think you can either. If you want to blame someone for holding up unity and a new contract look to USAPA. To me it is starting to seem that the majority of the east is ok with their current contract. That's ok I get it, you want the attrition. If USAPA's goal is to keep the pilot group separate until their junior members can take advantage of attrition you can't blame the company in turn for taking advantage of these same pilots. Of course Parker isn't going to give you pay parity until you give him one pilot group that will in turn help him with his goal of an acquisition or merger.