You and Weaasles continually try to make this point.
You are aware the FAs have a clause in their contract that resets pay if the average between DL and UA goes higher?
It's as simple as making the clause be " higher than DL or UA, whoever is higher, for the life of the contract".
What's that, the very experienced and knowledgable negotiating committee can't get that?
Why not?
We are losing money by the day, every day they delay.
At this point the Association is costing its membership money, the very people that pay their salaries.
Why are we not at the table yet? This is not rocket science.