What's new

And you want a raise?

The management at AA actually likes keeping a few "slugs" around in each work area because it gives them cover for their incompetence. This is why they will not write-up or fire these individuals.

Is it management keeping these idiots around or is it union rules? People ask why I've become more and more anti union over the last year, and beyond the TWU keeping its hand in my pocket and doing nothing for me, some of these rules mean we have to keep a lot of dead weight around instead of becoming more efficient. More efficient would mean less costs, more money to go after from AA and a higher paycheck for hard workers like most of us are.

Who really wants to keep these guys around? Arpey, who's stock goes down because of the added cost, or Jimmy Little who gets to collect dues from the dead weight?
 
HiFly2 has just joined a few other obnoxious SOBs on my "ignored" list.

He must be a recruiter for KFC and 7-11!
He probably get's a free bucket of chicken and a slurpee for each person he gets a job!
 
Is it management keeping these idiots around or is it union rules? People ask why I've become more and more anti union over the last year, and beyond the TWU keeping its hand in my pocket and doing nothing for me, some of these rules mean we have to keep a lot of dead weight around instead of becoming more efficient. More efficient would mean less costs, more money to go after from AA and a higher paycheck for hard workers like most of us are.

Who really wants to keep these guys around? Arpey, who's stock goes down because of the added cost, or Jimmy Little who gets to collect dues from the dead weight?
Please show us just one of these "union rules" that dictates that the company has to keep "these idiots around". Who hired them? Management. Who let them pass probation? Management. Who doesnt fire them? Management. The fact is the union has an obligation to all its members to insure that the contract is followed,nowhere in the contract is there language that says the company cant fire incompetant or unproductive workers, but the company has to document their problems with the employee, if the Company cant put together its case and fire a poor worker, the poor worker that they hired, whose fault is that? On the one hand you always cite how screwed up unions are but then try and make it sound like they are so powerful that they can force this huge multibillion dollar company to keep workers they dont want.
 
Dunno. I've spent the past six months watching my son work out with the Marine Corps (he reports to SAN in August). Doesn't matter if it's a gunny or the guys who have been in the delayed entry program for a couple months -- they have no problem cleaning up their own messes before it becomes a problem that an officer needs to deal with...

Perhaps what AA really needs is to fire all the existing supervisors, throw out the requirement for an A&P in management, and hire a couple hundred former Marines to take their places.
 
Dunno. I've spent the past six months watching my son work out with the Marine Corps (he reports to SAN in August). Doesn't matter if it's a gunny or the guys who have been in the delayed entry program for a couple months -- they have no problem cleaning up their own messes before it becomes a problem that an officer needs to deal with...

Perhaps what AA really needs is to fire all the existing supervisors, throw out the requirement for an A&P in management, and hire a couple hundred former Marines to take their places.

Throw out the A&P requirement? Thats an FAA requirement, but do as you like, imagine the games we could play if they had non-A&Ps calling the shots in a maintenance operation! Even UPS keeps their Maintenance workers seperate from the rest of the operation. One of my contacts there told me about an overzeolous station manager at UPS who wanted to make the Mechs accomplish other tasks in between trips and remove the lock from their ready room. One phone call-not to the Union but to maintenece control and the manager backed off.


Marines, (usually a Marine will tell you there is no such thing as a "former Marine", ask your son next year when he is out of boot camp) well we have quite a few amongst our ranks, but to apply those methods, which are designed to work on individuals without a fully developed frontal lobe (late teens early 20s) on a seasoned workforce would more than likely result in a fragging than a hazing.

We had a Marine go into management a while back, he was fired by the company after trying to employ such tactics on the workforce. Mechanics are highly individualistic, perhaps if we werent we would be better off, so most will not accept punishment in the name of another and most wont buy the arguement of from a supervisor of "blame him for what I am doing to you". We currently have another one, he hasnt reached retirement yet and he is learning that his observations of the core dont apply here where "lets make a deal" is more effective than attempting to intimidate and coerce by punishing the group for the actions of an individual. You have to remember that the focus of our job is problem solving, thinking, not just obeying orders from people who make the decisions. We enjoy a level of lattitude in our jobs that many dont and our licenses make us answerable to the FAA before the company. We can and are expected to disobey a direct order if it puts our license at risk. I recall going to Crandalls road shows where people from other departments would complain about Maintenence being unproductive, Crandalls response "If my planes are ready I have no problem with that, NEXT QUESTION".


One thing you dont seem to realize is that we have plenty of operations where we have no management on site for much of the time. Boston management will manage PHL and EWR from Boston, theres one supervisor for EWR and no supervisor for PHL, if the guys need management they call Boston, they dont report to anybody on the field except to get a signature on a grievance.

The mindset of mechanics is "You hired him, you take care of it, dont expect us to clean up your mess".

Crandall has been remembered as an effective airline manager, another effective airline manager, Gordon Bethune wrote in his book, you dont want to piss off your mechanics because if you do you wont get your airplane, he will work on it but he wont fix it, and there isnt much you can do about it". We are pretty much there, pissed off, you may cite they still getting their airplanes but that can change with just a little spark or that last little piece of straw. You have to remember that an airplane on the ground is more work for us, not less. Even aircraft that arent in use require maintenance.

With each passing day of concessions the standard for a SLUG becomes lower and lower as the regular workers become less and less enthused about their jobs.
 
We had a Marine go into management a while back, he was fired by the company after trying to employ such tactics on the workforce.

Bob, you couldn't be more right! But they didn't like that guy.
However, there is one Marine manager at the terminal who does whatever he wants. He says FU to the contract, gives us direct orders while bypassing the crew chiefs.

When will 562 put the brakes on this guy?

You need to have your E board deal with this individual once and for all.
 
Bob, you couldn't be more right! But they didn't like that guy.
However, there is one Marine manager at the terminal who does whatever he wants. He says FU to the contract, gives us direct orders while bypassing the crew chiefs.

When will 562 put the brakes on this guy?

You need to have your E board deal with this individual once and for all.

When he violates the contract, document it, I can't monotor him from Dallas. Like I said he doesnt use Marine tactics, he cuts deals with certain members of the Crew, (and later swears under oath there was no such deal), those crew members are still under the authority of the Crew Chiefs. If Crew Chiefs are in fact being bypassed without their consent they must document it.
 
RE: Throw out the A&P requirement? Thats an FAA requirement, but do as you like, imagine the games we could play if they had non-A&Ps calling the shots in a maintenance operation!

Bob, the entire DFW operation is called the Blair Witch Project. DFW is RUN by a Non - A&P named "Blair". He is a Director.
That is like having a Chief Pilot who never took a flying lesson, yet the FAA seems to think our program is good enough.


Now our organization is getting ready to reduce the frequency of "PS" Checks. Remember the start of this thread, the part about not using the E-58 portion of your checks? Here is the result as published TODAY by M/E Communications...

M&E Examines Overnight Aircraft Servicing – Maintenance programs are always a balancing act. Machines require periodic service in addition to repairs. Whether a manufacturer sets recommended service schedules, such as your automobile, or a company establishes its maintenance program, such as American Airlines, the purpose of the program is to balance effective service with reliability at an appropriate cost. Most people do not service their vehicles every 1000 miles. They follow the recommended service schedule. You are unlikely to change the oil in your mower each week. At American, we have done just the opposite. M&E Engineering has built our narrowbody PS Check on an interval of approximately 50 flight hours. The reality is that we are often performing PS Checks each evening on an interval of approximately six to ten flight hours. Multiple PS Checks within a single PS Check interval have not resulted in increased dependability. Faced with redundant work with no value added, M&E Planning met with AMTs and others to explore alternatives. Over the next few days, we will begin releasing the results of their efforts, which have culminated in the development of a new Routine Service, which will be placed into effect for overnight narrow body aircraft on January 18. (M&E Communications)

Can you imagine a room full of attorneys given as ripe an opportunity to write their own paychecks as we are (E58) and not using it? I repeat ... "And you want a pay raise"? Get ready for some mechanics with a lot of seniority transferring to New York. Anyone have a room for rent?
 
AA is simplifying the PS so you DON'T find items that take you time to fix. Hell, I could remember when a PS/0912 took half the night on an MD 80, top off engines/APU, check brakes, tires, ext. and int. lights, walk through the cabin, check the cockpit for porn and O2 quantity. I'm with you Phat, we need to document what we fix on E58's, no more freebies, and if we run into departure time, oh well.
 
Phat
Most people dont do a walk around on their car every time they go for a ride either, but then again a car isnt going 600MPH at 35000 ft either. This isnt the first time they reduced the frequency of PS checks, if thats what they are doing. What they end up doing is some sort of walk around anyway. Management will tell mechanics to go have a look even though there isnt a check assigned to it, otherwise they end up with the flight crew finding a leak or a tire change right before departure. Maybe SWA has been running their operation like this for years but SWA only flies over rivers and lakes, not oceans.

Tranfers to New York?! Maybe I'll finish my basement! From what I hear many of our recent upgrades may not be able to report due to not being able to find a landlord who will agree to rent to them because their income is too low.

I dont think that the idea is to reduce staffing but to try and get more MELs cleared instead of having the guys do PS checks, yep, 7 years of concessions will really motivate us to clear those MELS.

I agree, mechanics should document everything, from the roll of acars to the reading light.
 
Considering that WN knows more about the 737 than any other airline, I guess it makes sense that AA might be taking a closer look at their maintenance program.

AA sure is copying over a lot of WN's way of running an airline... first it was checkerboard gate manning, then distribution, and now maintenance checks....

Maybe the two will merge, and you guys could wind up getting WN pay after all?...
 
Considering that WN knows more about the 737 than any other airline, I guess it makes sense that AA might be taking a closer look at their maintenance program.

AA sure is copying over a lot of WN's way of running an airline... first it was checkerboard gate manning, then distribution, and now maintenance checks....

Maybe the two will merge, and you guys could wind up getting WN pay after all?...
🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄

thats a good one

so it will probaly happen

don't worry it still won't be good enough someone will piss and moan

if you told every mech. they will get 5millon dollars , but they had to leave AA, no one would get the money because someone would complain AA is screwing us over lol
 

Latest posts

Back
Top