What's new

Nov/Dec 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Phoenix said:
Give it a rest Snappy.  You are impugning your own integrity.  
 
You now want us to believe that you are smart enough to play a little trick of deceit of your own by posting Marty's proposed order as if it were Judge Silver's  (and you delight yourself that you tricked some Eastholes), but at the same time you want to say you were too stupid to read the MOU and were hoodwinked by USAPA...Either you are stupid and have integrity or you are smart and have no integrity.  You can't have it both ways.   If you keep this up there will be a preponderance of evidence that you might not even be a pilot, but instead may just be a punk paid instigator.   :lol:
 
In all fairness to the west position: "too stupid to read the MOU" appears to be a plausible argument...Just sayin'. Such certainly has historical precedence in the following: Duh...we'se din't knowz we'se hads 'da ssns of 'doze evil easties/etc.
 
Phoenix said:
Give it a rest Snappy.  You are impugning your own integrity.  
 
You now want us to believe that you are smart enough to play a little trick of deceit of your own by posting Marty's proposed order as if it were Judge Silver's  (and you delight yourself that you tricked some Eastholes), but at the same time you want to say you were too stupid to read the MOU and were hoodwinked by USAPA...Either you are stupid and have integrity or you are smart and have no integrity.  You can't have it both ways.   If you keep this up there will be a preponderance of evidence that you might not even be a pilot, but instead may just be a punk paid instigator.   :lol:
 
Your side has been trying to pull one on us for years. You're just ticked off because as I expected, y'all just react, walk around, throw stuff at the walls and see what sticks. You have no plan A or plan B.
 
How can you even come up with a valid argument when you don't read the transcripts or court docs?
 
Y'all look like fools.
 
Pull your pants up. :lol:
 
From some of the comments I've heard from Schreff, I bet he thought he was the star witness. I loved this-"THE COURT: Overruled. Let me see if I can get an answer this time." I wonder if Judge Silver is related to Judge Judy?
 
snapthis said:
 
Your side has been trying to pull one on us for years. You're just ticked off because as I expected, y'all just react, walk around, throw stuff at the walls and see what sticks. You have no plan A or plan B.
 
How can you even come up with a valid argument when you don't read the transcripts or court docs?
 
Y'all loo like fools.Pull your pants up. :lol:
I think PHX went and looked and called you on it. I said "Who cares? It didn't make any difference." I couldn't care less if it was a proposed order or actual order, it doesn't matter in the big picture. You guys are always throwing out rulings on motions  as if they are victories, leaving teeth on the floor.
 
You guys have read the tea leaves incorrectly a few times before. I'd give it up if I were you.
 
You never answered my question from a few weeks back. How can you keep a straight face on the "we've been duped!" defense?
 
snapthis said:
Y'all look like fools.
Whatever "you'se" say. 😉
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7lgU3J5seA&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PL21C1C7D32B996827
 
Pi brat said:
From some of the comments I've heard from Schreff, I bet he thought he was the star witness. I loved this-"THE COURT: Overruled. Let me see if I can get an answer this time." I wonder if Judge Silver is related to Judge Judy?
 
Who is Schreff? Do you get your info from Claxon? READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!
 
It's Scherff.
 
Pull your pants up. :lol:
 
Portly Dorman said:
As provided by Lyle Hogg.....what's your point?
 
Que link to video and another repeative quote.....
 
And how many personnel accounts where hacked???? This is a yet another Cleary/Bradford goose chase.....
 
Nothng to see here, move along...
 
Who knows what data was on the stolen laptop top of the door frame assaulter.
When USAPA gets the boot off our property we need to make sure the fools never hold a union position again.

Ever
 
snapthis said:
 
Who is Schreff? Do you get your info from Claxon? READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!
 
It's Scherff.
 
Pull your pants up. :lol:
Guilty as charged. I thought I'd had his name wrong all these years. Whatever his name, he is a star. Supported by my loved one that went to school with him.
 
snapthis said:
 
As provided by Lyle Hogg.....what's your point?
 
Que link to video and another repeative quote.....
 
And how many personnel accounts where hacked???? This is a yet another Cleary/Bradford goose chase.....
 
Nothng to see here, move along...
 
Who knows what data was on the stolen laptop top of the door frame assaulter.
 
One of your best posts. Just quoting another poster that doesn't have spell check.
 
Pi brat said:
Guilty as charged. I thought I'd had his name wrong all these years. Whatever his name, he is a star. Supported by my loved one that went to school with him.
She must have some good memories, pre-Pi 🙄
 
Pi brat said:
Pre and since according to her. Just not with the star witness.
She was not with the star witness according to her?
 
EastUS1 said:
In all fairness to the west position: "too stupid to read the MOU" appears to be a plausible argument...Just sayin'. Such certainly has historical precedence in the following: Duh...we'se din't knowz we'se hads 'da ssns of 'doze evil easties/etc.
I'd say that its a little worse than that...like when my apparent legal counsel aka Pat Skumanski, lies to my face and attempts a double cross. Of course, that POS and the rest of you scabs were stopped dead cold. As usual, a complete, laughable failure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top