Pi brat said:
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is a perfect example of what a community college education gets you: the inability to read.
Click on the above link and see for yourselves- it is interesting, to say the least, but 100% irrelevant to USAPA and the situation the greedy east pilots have put us in.
"Wide range of reasonableness" where does that term first come from? Rakestraw, which is a case dealing with a strike and replacement pilots. Does that apply here? Even a community college graduate like PIB can answer that.
The link above deals with racketeering. Does that apply to us? Even a community college attendee like PIB can figure that out. From the link our community college graduate posted:
Actually, the ‘sabotage’ to the substation was described in the Enmons decision as the“firing high-powered rifles at three Company transformers, draining the oil from a Company transformer, and blowing up a transformer substation owned by the Company.” However, since it was done during a lawful strike, it did not fall under the Court’s definition of extortion under the Hobbs Act.
If you really want to look at a relevant case to ours take a peek at Bernard v ALPA. Here is that case summary:
Bernard sued on behalf of himself and the other Jet America pilots alleging that ALPA had breached its duty of fair representation by: (1) excluding them from all negotiations for an agreement integrating the seniority lists of the two pilot groups; (2) entering into an agreement that discriminated against them in favor of the pre-merger Alaska pilots; and (3) failing to afford them the benefits of ALPA's own merger policy. Bernard then moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, preliminary injunctive relief setting aside the October 6 agreement pending a trial.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/19891086873F2d213_11026
So, ALPA got a DFR from a pilot group that they excluded in the formation of a combined seniority list. Injunction filed and guess what? Arbitration and seniority integration.
Now, with us, we have already been to arbitration. All we are (were) waiting on is (was) a combined contract. Well, we have that. 10h was placed in there simply to disadvantage the west. Can you say RIPE?
It's the beginning of the final chapter for you easties. The hysteria is getting comical, PIB's reference above was hilarious (irrelevant to arguing LUP but relevant in demonstrating the east desperation around here).