cleardirect
Veteran
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,234
- Reaction score
- 9,749
Dave O'dell has accepted a job on the east. Do you consider that a recall (I do not)? If so then every west pilot has had an opportunity to come back and therefore not furloughed but really on a leave. So there are no furloughed west pilots. All the west has to do is use the MDA argument that they were recalled to the "east division" and not furloughed.The same way the east furloughed pilots lost in the NIC by not being on the property. What goes around, comes around. It's the west way of doing things. If you have kept up with my posts, you would know that I do not believe an American merger would go DOH. An arbitrator will decide what to do with the pilots that elected furlough over coming back to work, not me.
So what seniority do you think Dave O'dell should have? His DOH? He was hired in 2005 so he has 7 years seniority according to east logic. Should he have his DOH senior to all the new hires? Should he be placed on the east list?
You ignored my point though. If you place the west "furloughed" pilots below 1000 east pilots. What happens to the west active pilots? Do they also lose 1000 numbers? Why. Do you separate the west active with the west "furloughed" pilots with a gap of 1000?
You need to reread your post and check your logic.
It was an arbitrator Nicolau that placed the furloughed pilots below active pilots just like your acknowleded that it would be an arbitrator deciding in the next integration.
usapa has a huge problem. In order to get the company to agree to anything other than the Nicolau usapa has to sell the company on LUP. What is the LUP for placing 1000 east pilot senior to west furloughs? Is it just the west furloughs that are going to have 1000 east pilots placed in front of them or will it be every west pilots with east pilots in front of us?
You east guys make these crazy statements with nothing to back up the logic.