US Pilots Labor Discussion 1/26- STAY ON TOPIC AND OBSERVE THE RULES

[Black Swan]

This explains a lot.

Educate me your supremacy. I hope you are in the position where you are not around children.

 

[BoeingBoy]

I can only speculate, which is all you can also.

I guess you're partially right - I speculate based on known facts while you speculate apparently based on nothing more than a desire to defend of USAPA.

Jim

 

[Black Swan]

This explains a lot.

Direct, certainly never Clear......

 

[luvn737s]

USAPA can never get beyond it's pride and just drop the suit. Because of the arcane laws that favor a union over the interests of the individuals involved (member or not) unions have deeper pockets to fund their juggernauts. It takes a membership that refuses to have it's money wasted (and since under RLA you can't protest the union's actions by witholding dues, so no one ever thinks of dues as anything but a tax in the abstract) to stand up and force the union to abandon wasteful vendettas that serve only to sooth the pride of the union bosses.

A USAPA TEA Party, so to speak.

 

[700UW]

You can become a dues objector and only pay for whats germane.

 

[Black Swan]

I guess you're partially right - I speculate based on known facts while you speculate apparently based on nothing more than a desire to defend of USAPA.

Jim

Where is your evidence? Regarding KNOWN facts??

 

[aquagreen73s]

You can become a dues objector and only pay for whats germane.

Damages are germane.

Where is your evidence? Regarding KNOWN facts??

You must have missed the Plaintiff's entire case in chief, where all kinds of exhibits were admitted into evidence which demonstrated that USAPA was formed as a mechanism to avoid the arbitration. When something is admitted into evidence in our court system, they become legal facts and arguably there isn't anyting in existence more factual than legal facts as nowhere else I can think of is there such an intense distillation and filtering process as with the Rules of Evidence.

 

[luvn737s]

B/S is unaware of the two lost arbitrations because they don't directly affect him/her. But when presented witht he opportunity to vote on changing the west contract to change the age 58 bypass to age 63 (something that equally did not affect him, but could have resulted in many west F/O upgrades while increasing the affected age 58 pilots salary) how did he/she vote?

USAPA gave the east pilots a free shot at the west and they took it and with it they took potentally thousands if not millions of dollars from the west pilot group.

Educate yourself before you vote.

 

[700UW]

Damages are germane.

Explain how damages are germane to the CBA?

 

[luvn737s]

Damages are germane.

I think that the circumstances surrounding this case make it worthy of litigating.

 

[nycbusdriver]

seems the alpa/usapa/bular phone tree is alive and well back east.

Oh...the phone tree thing...what a novel comeback. Any other "new" ideas?

 

[BoeingBoy]

Where is your evidence? Regarding KNOWN facts??

Answered by aquagreen...

Jim

 

[nycbusdriver]

What part of Binding do you not get...?

The jurors got it.

Because the judge wouldn't let them hear the whole truth. That will be Wake's embarrassment at the hands of the 9th.

 

[HPearlyretiree]

Because the judge wouldn't let them hear the whole truth. That will be Wake's embarrassment at the hands of the 9th.

Scapegoating again.

And if the 9th doesn't find your way, will you scapegoat the 9th? Of course you will, its never USAPA's fault that they couldn't live up to an agreement they signed.

 

[luvn737s]

No, because the judge would not let them rule on the fairness of the Nicolau award.