Black Swan
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 2,894
- Reaction score
- 5,045
After spending millions of dollars in PIC assessments USAPA discovered their first PIC law firm (Bingham & McCutcheon) had a conflict of interest with State Street Bank & Trust. According to USAPA the union fired Bingham & McCutcheon and replaced them with O'Dwyer and Bernstein because of "its extensive experience in the pension arenas and experience and depth of knowledge of State Street Bank and Towers Perrin."
See Story
However, hold the presses. Mike Cleary, Randy Mowery, Paul DiOrio, and Tracy Parella were the only people to know USAPA was going to file a Status Quo lawsuit against US Airways. Who filed the suit for USAPA? The new PIC law firm of O'Dwyer and Bernstein. The same firm USAPA hired to replace Bingham & McCutcheon to do the PIC work. Why? In my opinion, with USAPA is now operating about $400,000 over budget for the year with no money to defend its illegal slowdown litigation Cleary and his tight inner circle could be using PIC monies to pay for the Status Quo lawsuit against US Airways. If true, where will the money come from to fund PIC after two years of fruitless work? Will their be another assessment, increase in dues, or cut in services?
What "illegal slowdown" are you talking about? Everybody I know is extremely concerned with the CLT operation with regard to the RJ's speeding around like cruise missiles. None of them on the taxi lines, and every one of them a real hazard with the speed they taxi. Especially at C concourse at the choke point at the end. Nobody is doing anything illegal. It makes absolute sense to have both crew members heads up, and taxiing at an especially judicious speed to avoid being hit by an RJ. Your allegations are preposterous.