toganoflex
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2008
- Messages
- 557
- Reaction score
- 381
And it all begins with - compromise.
Just sayin.
Been there, tried that. It was called med/arb.
You can stay on LOA 93 while you figure it out.
Just sayin.
And it all begins with - compromise.
Just sayin.
But we can talk about this again - maybe same time next year, or the year after. I'm pretty patient.
So for the next 5-10 years you and all the east pilots plan on doing exactly what you are doing to day? After we get a contract you are all going to continue this same level of awareness writing up light bulbs and smudged placards?
If so where was all of this concern 6 months ago, a year ago? Why are you just now coming to the safety party? Where you unsafe before?
Solidarity?
Unity?
Nice words it is too bad that you east pilots have no idea what that means. From day one of usapa's unholy birth they and the east pilot have done nothing but divide this group. What is the mantra that east pilots spew everyday. Majority rules! When you leave out 1/3 of your group and attack another portion for disagreeing with you that is not unity.
usapa has never once ever tried to create unity or solidarity. RICO, Section 29, false allegations of ID theft, more law suits, removing west pilots from committees, removing west reps from meetings. Take a look down the terminal. How many US Airways pilots are wearing the cowardly yellow lanyards? All of them? 50%, 20%? This is the stand that Cleary wants to make leverage? Lanyards!
Good luck! usapa might be dangerous if they had any clue what the heck they were doing.
Excuse me, but it's neither unity nor solidarity when less than 2/3 of the pilot group wears them. Imagine a strike vote that had a 60-65% "yes" result. The company would laugh at you and bulldoze right over you. You are only proving their point for them. You have no unity. You'd be better off not saying a thing and letting them wonder if you had unity, than prove that you have none. What a bunch of amateurs.
Want proof? Ask any labor expert what kind of an affirmative strike vote you need to be successful. If it's not in the high 90's you are dead in the water. Even a 90% vote will put you dead in the water.
Some of your guys made fun of UA's "Hats Off" campaign not long ago. Granted it was nothing but symbolic. But we had almost 98% compliance. That show of solidarity bugged management so much, they issued a revision and removed the hat from the FOM as part of the required uniform. They knoew that sending out the uniform police to enforce the hat would be futile.
If US management pushes forward with their plan, your mis-led pilots will fall one by one. Once a few examples have been made, watch how fast guys stop wearing the lanyard in direct defiance of the direction of your union officers. And listen closely for the laughter coming from corporate headquarters. You'll be able to hear it well east of the Mississippi.
Good luck with your "safety campaign." (ie: distraction)
Clarify something for me Bob. Would that be safe. as in shooting a hole in the airplane due to careless handling of a firearm, or safer, as in damaging an airplane in Hartford by racing to the gate, or would it be safest, as in doing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to two airplanes due to careless taxiing of an A330 in Charlotte?It's not a bad idea to be safe, safer, safest. Hopefully this will continue a long time. I've always been at the safety party. My company demands it.
Clarify something for me Bob. Would that be safe. as in shooting a hole in the airplane due to careless handling of a firearm, or safer, as in damaging an airplane in Hartford by racing to the gate, or would it be safest, as in doing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to two airplanes due to careless taxiing of an A330 in Charlotte?
And could a simple lanyard prevented all this???
Full page USAPA "safety" ad in today's USA TODAY on page 5B.
OUTSTANDING!!!!!!!
OUTSTANDING!!!!!!!
And could a simple lanyard prevented all this???
Clarify something for me Bob. Would that be safe. as in shooting a hole in the airplane due to careless handling of a firearm, or safer, as in damaging an airplane in Hartford by racing to the gate, or would it be safest, as in doing hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage to two airplanes due to careless taxiing of an A330 in Charlotte?
And could a simple lanyard prevented all this???