CV580ETOPS
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2006
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 81
Trying to harm a minority and not living up to your agreements are expensive endeavors.
Very nice !!
CV
Trying to harm a minority and not living up to your agreements are expensive endeavors.
Trying to harm a minority and not living up to your agreements are expensive endeavors.
you can't get over it?
My thoughts exacly. As I was reading the complaint all I could think of was why didn't the cactus 18 file one of these against Seham. He laid out the reason right here.This will be laughed right out of court faster than that bogus Rico case. Any of you WELL versed easties care to place a bet with me on this for an expensive dinner say Mortons or some place on that level????
2. Bad faith attempt to pursue claims already dismissed.
3. The un-cured pleading is presented for an improper purpose: to harass and to needlessly increase the cost of litigation in violation of Rule 11( B )(1).
When an attorney files a pleading she or he certifies that, “to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, – (1) [the pleading] is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; [and] (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law ...” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11( B )(1)-(2).
The RICO case was dismissed with prejudice. The court found the complaint not to be well founded.Courts reviewing a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 apply a reasonable inquiry test, which is “meant to assist courts in discovering whether an attorney, after conducting an objectively reasonable inquiry into the facts and law, would have found the complaint to be well-founded.”
A showing of bad faith may justify sanctions under Rule 11, but it is not required. When a complaint (or claim) is at issue, “a district court must conduct a two prong inquiry to determine (1) whether the complaint is legally or factually baseless from an objective perspective, and (2) if the attorney has conducted a reasonable and competent inquiry before signing and filing it.”
(The “central purpose of Rule 11 is to deter baseless filings in the district court and streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts.”). This Court has jurisdiction to impose sanctions upon any party, or its counsel, who has presented papers to it even where the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 U.S. 131 (1992); Orange Prod. Credit Ass’n v. Frontline Ventures, Ltd., 792 F.2d 797, 801 (9th Cir. 1986).8 This is true even of the sanction of dismissal with prejudice. In re Exxon Valdez, 102 F.3d 429, 431 (9th Cir. 1996); Caribbean Broadcasting Sys. v. Cable & Wireless PLC, 148 F.3d 1080, 1091 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
Ahh, did the Spartans lose the war? We disagree on the dfr, it served us well. The statue of limitations is no longer a concern, and the discovery is done and paid for.A lot of guys out there like that Leonidas name even though he and most of his followers were wiped out.
Why is it that there has to be accusations of ulterior motives when someone disagrees with the East position?
Jim
You have to be kidding, right? You are the King of that!
The RICO case was dismissed with prejudice. The court found the complaint not to be well founded.
How about Micky " D"s we want you to feel at home.
Ahh, did the Spartans lose the war? We disagree on the dfr, it served us well. The statue of limitations is no longer a concern, and the discovery is done and paid for.
Ok, prove it. Count up how many times I've started it vs the number of times I've been accused/slandered/called names/etc first. Otherwise I think I'll bestow on you the crown nycbusdriver bestowed on me - KOAT (knower of all things) since you seem to think you're perfect while everyone who disagrees or uses words you don't like is scum. Maybe you could even start your own forum where you can kick out anyone who upsets your delicate sensibilities.
Jim
I was really asking nic if he was expecting a Thank You note for the west attorneys, but I can have a laugh at our side. I like his sense of humor, sometimes.
Seems to me that filing premature DFR suits is expensive too, and you get to pay both attorneys! Thanks!
A lot of guys out there like that Leonidas name even though he and most of his followers were wiped out.
How many times have you told me what I think? My feelings about DOH? Ring a bell?
You didn't offend my sensibilities, but I sure seemed to get to yours, didn't I?
Hey Driver,
Does the above imply what one brings to the table equipment wise or pilot wise?