US Pilots Labor Discussion

[Pi brat]

Awwww, getting a taste of your own medicine? Don't like it? Awwwww.

Maybe you are new here. Not my medicine, I defended the C18 (the ones drug into it from the AWAPPA board). So for you two wrongs make a right? Do unto others as they have done unto you?

 

[luvn737s]

Regarding those that were involved in the Ansett flying,

Was the crew that eventually flew the flight Capt. Wells refused, considered scabs? Did they not receive compensation they might not otherwise have absent her refusal to fly?

If, after her China Syndrome, Capt. Wells decided to hand in her ID and quit, would the next pilot who flew the flight she may have been scheduled for be considered a scab?

Changing the landscape slightly, suppose her flight was a domestic one, say PHL-PHX. If her flight was canceled and the passengers re-accomodated on another US flight, would the pilots of that flight be considered scabs? Suppose they were placed on a Southwest flight. Should the Southwest captain block the door and not allow those passengers on his airplane under penalty of being labeled a scab?

Are refusals to fly to be treated as mini-wildcat strikes and considered as radioactive struck work, or not? If so, why have a grievance process and why should anyone expect management to adhere to a contract. If not, why would one pilot be considered a scab and another simply responding to a reserve callout if it's only a matter of scale?

 

[Pi brat]

Was the crew that eventually flew the flight Capt. Wells refused, considered scabs? Did they not receive compensation they might not otherwise have absent her refusal to fly?

If, after her China Syndrome, Capt. Wells decided to hand in her ID and quit, would the next pilot who flew the flight she may have been scheduled for be considered a scab?

Changing the landscape slightly, suppose her flight was a domestic one, say PHL-PHX. If her flight was canceled and the passengers re-accomodated on another US flight, would the pilots of that flight be considered scabs? Suppose they were placed on a Southwest flight. Should the Southwest captain block the door and not allow those passengers on his airplane under penalty of being labeled a scab?

Are refusals to fly to be treated as mini-wildcat strikes and considered as radioactive struck work, or not? If so, why have a grievance process and why should anyone expect management to adhere to a contract. If not, why would one pilot be considered a scab and another simply responding to a reserve callout if it's only a matter of scale?

Wow. No wonder you guys throw the term around so easily.

 

[Move2CLT]

Maybe you are new here. Not my medicine, I defended the C18. So for you two wrongs make a right? Do unto others as they have done unto you?

Works for me. Eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, right Pi?

 

[Move2CLT]

Wow. No wonder you guys throw the term around so easily.

Wow, no wonder you guys ignore the term so easily and elect them to represent you and speak for you.

 

[Pi brat]

Works for me. Eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, right Pi?

So that soon we will all be blind and wearing dentures! Sounds like a plan and history has shown how well it works. A few more centuries and our children's children will still be fighting!

 

[Move2CLT]

You guys can end this now by accepting your agreed to binding arbitration and we can move on a contract together.

Or we can perpetuate the court battle ad Infinitum.

Your choice, not ours.

 

[crazystnic]

You guys can end this now by accepting your agreed to binding arbitration and we can move on a contract together.

Or we can perpetuate the court battle ad Infinitum.

Your choice, not ours.

Have we not been thru this? Asked and Answered.

 

[Pi brat]

You guys can end this now by accepting your agreed to binding arbitration and we can move on a contract together.

Or we can perpetuate the court battle ad Infinitum.

Your choice, not ours.

Or, we can accept that neither side is going to give in, that both sides will fight the seniority battle until the last gavels falls, so we set that aside and work together on everything else and stop throwing rocks at each other. One can dream....................

 

[cleardirect]

Looks like other people are picking up on the east way of doing things. If you don;t like the call pick up your ball and go home. Only thing is you lose the game in the end.

Really Safety concerns?

http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/blog/prep_rally/post/Coach-8217-s-disagreement-with-ref-leads-to-tea?urn=highschool-wp5380

 

[Move2CLT]

Or, we can accept that neither side is going to give in, that both sides will fight the seniority battle until the last gavels falls, so we set that aside and work together on everything else and stop throwing rocks at each other. One can dream....................

Ok, then start by removing the DOH integration mandate from your C&BLs.

 

[nevergiveup]

Ok, then start by removing the DOH integration mandate from your C&BLs.

The west can remove their requirement to use the NIC. Looks like love is just around the corner!

 

[Move2CLT]

The west can remove their requirement to use the NIC. Looks like love is just around the corner!

Who is the west and where is the requirement? The only paper anyone has regarding the Nic is Parker and that's in his desk.

Stupid post bro. Take a break.

 

[Claxon]

You guys can end this now by accepting your agreed to binding arbitration and we can move on a contract together.

Or we can perpetuate the court battle ad Infinitum.

Your choice, not ours.
[/quote


Eastern division pilots will wait for the inevitable decision that Niclau is dead. Then they will roll into a contract vote which will pass without the dissenting western vote. Your choice.

 

[Move2CLT]

God dam it Claxon will you please make an effort to learn how to properly use quote tags!!!! :angry:

I'm confused here. Barrister says Nic is already dead yet you state the east is still waiting for the decision that Nic is dead.

Which is it?

PM Barrister and get your stories straight and then repost here. I'll wait.