I love these CLT guys. You truly couldn't find a more moronic trio if you tried.
"Make no mistake; LOA 93, if won, will be a game changer and will make the 15[SUP]th[/SUP] and 30[SUP]th[/SUP] easier to live with (for some of us)..."
Fist off, its good to see some realism in the above sentence with the word "if.". Unfortunately, fantasy soon ensures. If they think that their paychecks will magically grow overnight then they're idiots. The remedy portion of the arbitration is going to take a couples of years at the very least. And who is to say the company has to follow binding arbitration. I think there is precedence on that, right?
"Even if we win we must intensify our efforts to negotiate to a complete joint contract to return all our pilots to the industry standards we all deserve."
Intensify how? Are you not intense now. What will be difference. What if an injunction is in place? Will that have an impact on intensity?
"If we win, it almost certainly would cause the Company to start bargaining in good faith towards an industry standard contract for all US Airways pilots."
If you win, nothing changes. Your paychecks stay the same and there are no snapbacks. The remedy phase drags out for a few years and you flounder under an injunction. In the mean time, the company shifts flying west.
"If we lose, the pilot group will become increasingly frustrated by the Company's lack of good faith at the bargaining table, which should move things along."
This is a completely asinine statement. How will frustration move things along? Are they insinuating a more intense work action? Or do they think Doug will sense the east's frustration and cave? Absolutely dumb. But it's great for the company as I'm sure it will be included in the pile of evidence the company already has.
Please Pi tell me that you see this BS for what it is. If you don't, I may lose all the respect I have for you and no longer see you as my equal on this board. You'll be nothing more than a Claxon/MM/aPollo/Bluto to me.