What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
We need to lay this 2/3rds of the West thing to rest right now.

You morons are sooo unaware of the demographic of the West, that you come up with crap like this fantasy.

I am in the top 1/3rd of the West, and guess what, I am in no mood to give some furloughed east guy with less LOS my job. I am even less inclined to let usapa enable him to be a scab and steal it from me. Oh, and if you go to the top 1/4th of the West list, we are still in no mood to go behind furloughees like Coello. Lets go even further, the top 1/10th of the list is in no mood to have another 1000 piled on top of them after they already had 517 piled in front before the slotting started.


Besides, watching you squirm on LOA93 and the TA fleet mins are worth more than the 10% raise in pay with an accompanying 100% reduction in seniority that you are trying to sell, so basically the entire West list is on the AOL bandwagon.
Do you have more than 17 years in this hell hole? I bet not. I know just where you belong on the list. If the East is squirming on 93 the west will be shaking more than a meth addict whore in church. Get ready kid your in for a big surprise.
 
Oh really? Still huffing the bull#### gas from $eham and Bradford are you? DOH is right around the corner :lol:
No I have 413 acres of gas in sw pa. I have all the gas I need....... and yes DOH is right around the corner sooner than you think.
 
If the east doesn't win the LOA 93 grievance (totally win, not just the annual 3% started) and get DOH, I foresee a lot of easties slinking quietly away rather than admit how wrong they were. Other than a couple who will still claim victory and that someone else got spanked... :lol:

Jim
 
If the east doesn't win the LOA 93 grievance (totally win, not just the annual 3% started) and get DOH, I foresee a lot of easties slinking quietly away rather than admit how wrong they were. Other than a couple who will still claim victory and that someone else got spanked... :lol:

Jim

Wrong old man....we still get to vote....don't ever forget it!!

NICDOA
NPJB
 
Exactly. If the choice is LOA 93 or a contract with Nic, I suspect the contract would pass. USAPA doesn't want the Nic issue settled for some reason...wonder why?

Jim
 
If the east doesn't win the LOA 93 grievance (totally win, not just the annual 3% started) and get DOH, I foresee a lot of easties slinking quietly away rather than admit how wrong they were. Other than a couple who will still claim victory and that someone else got spanked... :lol:

Jim
It will all be ALPA's fault.
 
If you east pilots and Seham are so smart. Why did Seham throw the kitchen sink at the ninth? Why not go in there say it is not ripe and sit down. If it was such a slam dunk and everyone know it.

Why is it that not one of you outhouse lawyers who says it is so obvious now never even heard of or spoke the words not ripe before the ninth ruled?

You realy are a dumbass aren't you. If you have 5 winning arguments but only give one to the judge?..what if you do lose the one you gave him.
Can't rule on an argument that wasn't made....except Wake of course. Get some brains or get off. PS...the concept of ripeness is in the first 20 pages of every Civil Procedure law book at every law school in this country.

NICDOA
NPJB
 
"Paging Ms. DreaminofCLT. Ms. DreaminofCLT, you have a message on the white courtesy phone. Many, many people are waiting for your definition of double digit profitable quarters."

Probably getting scarce since the LOA93 decision is going to the pilots.

breeze
 
PS...the concept of ripeness is in the first 20 pages of every Civil Procedure law book at every law school in this country.

Yeah, law schools deal with concepts. Lawyers deal with the real world where different courts and even different Judges rule differently depending on the circumstances. Care to explain both the 9th's and SCOTUS' differing rulings on ripeness? Or is the concept all you can absorb?

Jim
 
Probably getting scarce since the LOA93 decision is going to the pilots.

I think everyone should be required to do as Hate has done in the past - post a list of their "sure things". Then when they're wrong, like Hate, they can just change the date on the list and ignore being wrong - but everyone else will know that they were wrong... :lol:
 
You realy are a xxxxxxx aren't you. If you have 5 winning arguments but only give one to the judge?..what if you do lose the one you gave him.
Can't rule on an argument that wasn't made....except Wake of course. Get some brains or get off. PS...the concept of ripeness is in the first 20 pages of every Civil Procedure law book at every law school in this country.

NICDOA
NPJB

Name calling really. Weak argument.

But you guys now know for sure that it was not ripe. If it was a sure thing you would only need one argument. That is my point. What if you lose. At least you admit that it was not a sure thing like some of your outhouse lawyers claim.
 
Yeah, law schools deal with concepts. Lawyers deal with the real world where different courts and even different Judges rule differently depending on the circumstances. Care to explain both the 9th's and SCOTUS' differing rulings on ripeness? Or is the concept all you can absorb?

Jim


The Ninth, without a single dissent (assent, whatever) said "No" to an En Banc hearing as to the Addington ripeness decision. SCOTUS said "No" to hearing an appeal. Different? You got me there. And please, don't embarrass yourself this time quoting unnamed googled cases not involving the RLA.

What does Matlock say?

RR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top