I guess you can consider yourself safe since I'm not on the NC.God, I hope you're not on the Negotiating Committee. Your idea of acceptable is pathetic. Nic or no Nic, I would vote NO for a contract with those pay rates.
I was asked a straight forward question. I did not say I would go in with that as my starting position. But that is my bottom line. Eventually we all get a vote. You can vote how ever you want. I'm a realist. I think there was a time years ago when we could have gotten more. But now, we'd be lucky to get something just short of JB/Spirit/Delta rates for similar equipment. The devil is in the details, and there are many cost items in our contract that are not in the hourly rate. Some productivity I would be willing to bend on. Things like scope, not so much.
My premise to all of this is that the arbitrated award is not so atrocious when you get away from raw numbers and look at the net effect. I just don't see the travesty. Not to mention the lack of integrity by going back on our commitment. Imagine how much more money every USAriways pilot would have today if the rates I'm talking about went into effect 5 years ago. Now take the few who are waiting for the "attrition train" to check out next year. At LOA93 rates, how long will he have to work before breaking even compared to that.
At some point a person has to know when it's time to cut the losses and move forward.