As far as we can tell, there has never been a case where the NMB reversed a single carrier determination for the purposes of allowing two groups within the formerly single carrier to negotiate. Never. Single carrier status marked the passing of the event horizon - there's no going back. The company is the entity that filed for and received single carrier. Parker is the one, yet he also is chirping about compromise to the West; as if it's our fault. Unbelievable. He did his part and Bradford did USAPA's part to create this all-or-nothing paradigm, yet now it's USAPA and Parker saying the West has to compromise. After what those two have done, how?