Okay, thanks for the clarification. Honest question: Do you see a possibility of USAPA not appealing all the way to the SCOTUS? Because that's where I see it ending and if there are other thoughts on this I'd like to hear them and not just have shots taken at me for asking. I realize that often questions on here are not really questions.
The judge will provide an answer on what the company's obligations or liabilities are regarding the transition agreement and specifically pertaining to the seniority list. Whatever answer she gives will be it and the company will use it.
If she tells the company that they are free to negotiate seniority with ucrapa without fear of inclusion in a DFR (quite doubtful) that's what they will do.
If she tells them that they signed an agreement and are obligated to its terms (most likely) then the company will turn to the east and say "the devil made me do it. We're obligated to the Nic. Please don't blame me". Then we will move on.
It is obvious the company now wants to settle this (merger anyone?) and they will do what is in their best interest any way they can.
If ucrapa doesn't get its way they can appeal to SCOTUS, Jesus Christ, Buddah, Yaweh, anwhere they want. It just won't matter.
