Well since it depends on who you ask maybe we need a third-party neutral arbitrator to decide how to handle the guys who weren't fully on active status and yet not fully on a furloughed status. Once that arbitrator decides, then there really should be no question or doubt remaining about how they should be handled going forward. Agreed?
Agreed. I've said before, many times, that my opinion doesn't matter but you guys keep bringing it up trying to convince us
of the fairness. That will never happen. About 10 pages on here just because I countered aqua on his "the east got a marginally better relative position statement". I even agreed with him, I just said it didn't paint the whole picture. I showed you why I said that and all they usual villagers get their panties in a wad.
