What's new

US Pilots Labor Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any word on the house cleaning in CLT? Were they expected or unexpected? And how come the change now? This is in regards to the CP office.....rumors flying yesterday

The CLT Chief Pilot's Office staffing changed immediately after the Preliminary Injunction against USAPA became Permanent. Is this coincidental or planned? In my opinion, those CLT pilots who have violated company policy, violate the Ethics Manual, do not wear the correct lanyard, or continue to operate aircraft in less than an efficient manner may now have increased risk of discipline and/or termination.

Furthermore, the Pilot Records Improvement Act requires an airline pilot's employment record for the past 5 years to be sent to any new employer. If a pilot is disciplined or terminated at US Airways or any other carrier his or her employment record and discipline information must be sent by US Airways to the prospective new employer during the background check.

I believe every employee needs to support US Airways to become the best airline in the world. It serves no useful purpose to damage the company, pilots need to operate their aircraft efficiently, and pilots must provide the company's customers the best travel experience possible. Strong operations, reduced costs, and improved revenue provides US Airways with more money to pay employees, when the union eventually gets to that point in new contract discussions.
 
The Permanent Injunction is not only against the union...it is against every US Airways pilot. Therefore, if the pilot group returned to ALPA the injunction would stand until ALPA and US Airways reach an agreement on a new collective bargaining agreement or the National Mediation Board releases the parties from mediation.

That is no different than the Transition Agreement and the subsequent arbitration between THE PILOTS IN THE SERVICE OF... and THE PILOTS IN THE SERVICE OF.... Seham (and of course Baptiste and Wilder) knew better, but figured he would see what he could sneak past a judge.

For lawyers, experience doesn't mean knowing right from wrong, it means know what works and what doesn't.
 
Any word on the house cleaning in CLT? Were they expected or unexpected? And how come the change now? This is in regards to the CP office.....rumors flying yesterday
Change starts at the top. I would expect the new sheriffs to be quick on the discipline trigger for awhile. Got to show the boys who is in change and show the boss that they can be tough. If I were a CLT pilots and supportive of usapa I would be very careful. Also reading the injunction transcripts if I were one of the 17 usapa lackeys with access to CATCREW I would be very worried. One of those 17 handed out the pink pantie award. the other chief pilots may not have wanted to do anything but these new guys were hired for a reason.

Also all of those "favors" done for the last guys are gone and forgotten.
 
Pension Investigation Committee Update: January 13, 2012

Dear Pilots of the former US Airways Pension Plan,

We have been fielding a number of phone calls inquiring about "what's going on." In mid-November we received the following message from our attorney David Butler:

"Attached please find a notice and order we received today from the federal court. As you will see, six cases, including ours, have been reassigned from Judge Kennedy's docket to the docket of a senior judge from the Northern District of New York (Syracuse) named Frederic J. Scullen, Jr. There is no explanation as to why this has been done. And, unfortunately, there is nothing we can do about it."

Since that notice was released to us, there have been a multitude of events behind the scenes to include Office of Inspector General's (OIG) Report on the way PBGC handled the investigation of the United Pilot's Pension Fund, and now other pension funds. (Please see the attached article from Jan. 12, titled Inspector General Faults PBGC's "Systemic" Failures, regarding this topic.)

PBGC is now under serious fire for their conduct and the way they have been handling "Investigations" of failed pension funds. As a matter of fact, it is very clear they never investigated anyone's pension as identified by the OIG, and the valuation of these pension funds went under valued at the cost to the beneficiaries, including ours. This under-valuation would affect the amount paid to the beneficiaries.

Remember that we reported to you that PBGC has been constantly preaching to the court that "$510M would have to be recovered before the pilots would see an additional penny." During the deposition process, PBGC testified time after time that they could not produce evidence as to how they came up with that number, and in fact since taking over the plan, they had actually made $175M from it.

Because of the OIG Report on United, and even though we have submitted final briefs in late August and now a change in judges has occurred, we contacted Judge Fredrick Scullen who will now preside over the case. Hopefully he will render his decision shortly. Before that happens, we intended and were granted a "status update." The status update gives an opportunity to "make sure" the Judge is educated on all aspects, both in the past through the briefs and now the "latest developments." We were scheduled for that "status update" conference on December 28. However, on December 27 we were notified that Judge Scullen had to have some surgery done and the conference would have to be rescheduled. We expect that will happen soon.

PBGC is now faced with the fact that the American Airlines employees' pension fund might be knocking on their doorsteps. In the past, PBGC was licking their chops at the opportunities of recovering a pension fund of this size. PBGC does not have to take a pension fund. They do it voluntarily, and when they do, they're required to follow ERISA Laws. In the past, instead of taking the "snapshot" and later administering a "Limited Scope Audit," we feel PBGC is going to be forced to truly "investigate" this pension fund, like they should have been doing all along. If you read the articles surrounding PBGC's possibility of acquiring AMR's Employee Pension Funds, they are showing signs of pushing away.

This committee is waiting for the following: We await the Judge's findings, and we await the final forensic report that is still being collated. This is a very complex and comprehensive report. Please be patient with the process. You would expect us to be thorough, and that's what you will get. We'll soon let you know what we plan to do with that report. It's not the end of the investigation.

Thank you again for your continued support.


F/O Dave Westberg, Chairman

Capt. Dave Koseruba, Co-Chairman

F/O Robert Whitt

Capt. Mark Butler

F/O Jeff Krumeich

Capt. Bruce Quinby

Capt. Rich Peters


Please read the above article about the PBGC. Stay informed through these updates or calling the committee members of the Pension Investigation Committee. It is still too early to speculate what the outcome will be. In the meantime, please write your Senators and Congressmen in support of the Pilots Equitable Treatment Act, seeking their support.
 
Could a merger with AA be a way out of the pilot's integration problem and an end to USAPA?

Four weeks from today replies are due in the DJ lawsuit and then Judge Silver will rule. Every indication points to her ruling in AOL's favor. I expect USAPA to appeal Judge Silver's decision to the Ninth Circuit Court and I would be surprised if the Appelate Court heard the case. Therefore, this seniority mess could end this year.

Most articles believe any bid by Doug Parker for AA is "likely many months away and would hinge on AMR’s ability to use the Chapter 11 process to chop its labor costs, shed unwanted aircraft and mark down its contracts with suppliers." Therefore, a potential takeover bid could happen about the same time the Courts order US Airways and USAPA to implement the Nicolau Award. Unfortunately for US Airways' pilots, unless something changes with USAPA's elections...following the next mediated negotiation session, which is scheduled for the week of January 23, USAPA said, "further NMB mediated sessions for subsequent months appear to be unlikely."

Doug knows this too.

Therefore, could the pilot's new contract be a 3-way contract with the pre-merger US Airways LOA 93, AWA C2004, and AA pilots contracts becoming DAL + 1% to buy APA and US Airways' pilot's support for the M&A deal? And, could this become an end of the US Airways-AWA pilot seniority integration issue, the end of the joint contract problem; along with the end of USAPA with the combined pilot group represented by APA?
 
17 usapa people do according to the company.
With CATCREW, it not "page" (singular) but pages (plural). Depending on the access level they've been given, they may be able to access/change your bids (permanent/monthly/vacation), personal info, contact info, etc.

All the years I was on the permanent bid committee and checking pilot's bids/schedules/contact info every time there was a questionable bid (76I captain voluntarily bidding 737 FO, for example) we never had access to anything but our own CATCREW pages just like any line pilot. We used the access the RIDC people had that actually ran the bids.

Jim
 
Any word on the house cleaning in CLT? Were they expected or unexpected? And how come the change now? This is in regards to the CP office.....rumors flying yesterday
Completely expected.

Aside from not disciplining east pilots for their work action BS, they pissed off Isom.

At one CP meeting, Isom asked the CLT CPs what needed to be done to bring these guys in line and their answer was to give them pay parity with the west.

Wrong answer. Isom blew a gasket. Their days were numbered at that point.

BTW, there's more to come.
 
17 usapa people do according to the company.
Given a choice, who would you rather see with your personal information - west pilots trying to inform pilots who don't have all the facts about the odds of "winning" the seniority dispute and what the real impact of the NIC is, or USAPA who has brought RICO charges against its own members/constituents, trying to terminate pilots for unpaid dues, uses illegal tactics to gain negotiating leverage, sends pink pantie awards to pilots who do not fall in line with their agenda, hired $eham only to turn around and accuse him of billing irregularities, has squandered away every bit of dues money collected without producing a single positive result but wants and needs even more money to pursue their failed agenda? So, which group seems to be less trustworthy with you personal information?
 
Could a merger with AA be a way out of the pilot's integration problem and an end to USAPA?

Four weeks from today replies are due in the DJ lawsuit and then Judge Silver will rule. Every indication points to her ruling in AOL's favor. I expect USAPA to appeal Judge Silver's decision to the Ninth Circuit Court and I would be surprised if the Appelate Court heard the case. Therefore, this seniority mess could end this year.

Most articles believe any bid by Doug Parker for AA is "likely many months away and would hinge on AMR’s ability to use the Chapter 11 process to chop its labor costs, shed unwanted aircraft and mark down its contracts with suppliers." Therefore, a potential takeover bid could happen about the same time the Courts order US Airways and USAPA to implement the Nicolau Award. Unfortunately for US Airways' pilots, unless something changes with USAPA's elections...following the next mediated negotiation session, which is scheduled for the week of January 23, USAPA said, "further NMB mediated sessions for subsequent months appear to be unlikely."

Doug knows this too.

Therefore, could the pilot's new contract be a 3-way contract with the pre-merger US Airways LOA 93, AWA C2004, and AA pilots contracts becoming DAL + 1% to buy APA and US Airways' pilot's support for the M&A deal? And, could this become an end of the US Airways-AWA pilot seniority integration issue, the end of the joint contract problem; along with the end of USAPA with the combined pilot group represented by APA?

It would be a two-way: Nic and APA.
 
It would be a two-way: Nic and APA.
But if there is never a CBA (and I think we all know there will never be a CBA because the company doesn't want one), Usapa reps the west and asks for DOH. I would want to see the west be able to have their own representation in a 3 way. Not sure if it could be legally done.
 
But if there is never a CBA (and I think we all know there will never be a CBA because the company doesn't want one), Usapa reps the west and asks for DOH. I would want to see the west be able to have their own representation in a 3 way. Not sure if it could be legally done.
Asking for DOH is sheer suicide for the East as it'll be the equivalent of going through an arbitration and not making a single argument: DOH can't be reconciled with the US Airways list which will be the Nicolau. You had better start thinking logically because if you go into an AMR merger thinking you can rewrite the AAA-AWA seniority list, you're in for smack-down number 183, or whatever ungodly number of losses you're up to.
 
With CATCREW, it not "page" (singular) but pages (plural). Depending on the access level they've been given, they may be able to access/change your bids (permanent/monthly/vacation), personal info, contact info, etc.
Thanks, the permanent bid is what concerns me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top