That was true for a few months after NIC came out.
Now, years later nobody cares what was going on back then.
Right now if I vote for anything that contains NIC or candidates that support NIC it hurts me. Right now if the bottom 1/3 of the active east list votes for anything NIC they are voting to be stapled below 1600 west pilots. It really is that simple.
As long as the battlecry is "NIC unmolested" it will always be this way till the very very very last court battle is fought, whatever year that may be.
You accuse the east of ignoring what happened years ago. What AOL is ignoring is the current situation and the harm that east pilots will be doing to their quality of life and future prospects. They send flyers out etc. For 1/3 of the recepient list of those flyers NIC puts 1600 pilots senior to them that are not senior right now. For the other 2/3 it is a sliding scale of of 1500, 1400, 1300, 1200 etc as it moves up the list.
It's not 2005 or 2007, and there is no way to get pilots to vote like it is.
Next time thru CLT or PHL stop an East F/O and ask him if he feels like NIC would be a staple job for him/her? Most of the active east F/O's fall into the group that is at the bottom of the list under every west pilot on NIC even though their hire dates range from 1988 to 2008. Does not matter to them if they were furloughed or not even hired at the time NIC came out. They have a vote, and voting for NIC is bad for them.
Right or wrong that is the situation. Telling some guy to vote to put 1600 pilots above him because thats what some old guy said should be done 6 years ago is like telling a voter this coming november to "Vote for Bush" It is irrelevant to the voters current situation. Ignoring the current voter base as AOL is doing will never get this sorted out, and the more newhires we get on the property only makes it even more irrelevant at the polls.