Beancounter
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,378
- Reaction score
- 1,817
I found your viewpoint very interesting Beancounter.Do I feel the West pilots have reason to be angry? Absolutely. I will be honest and say had I been on your side of this, I would have been surprised at what I got, and angry I could not make it happen. As far as LOA 93 and the East pilots? I feel they are extremely angry with it. That anger coming from the stupid realization from those who voted for it to "save" the company, that their sacrifice was taken, and used to beat them over the head later, after the "trouble" was past. Personally, I voted no.I counsel everyone NEVER to take the first offer any way. And by the way, I honestly commended the west pilots at the time when I read you downed the first offer you were given some time ago, before this mess even transpired. Back to LOA 93- I think those who voted yes were those who honestly felt their sacrifice was necessary, and would be recognized. That is the trouble with being part of the transition while working with groups who actually valued you, to those who would use you. Simply, the East pilots who voted for it feel "had" and they are now going to follow all SOP s and FAR's to the letter. So, living under LOA 93 as some say is going to happen in perpetuity? Never going to happen.I don't think they will make it through the summer seeing the age of the people involved, and the anger they hold. There just is not that much to lose in their eyes. If Parker does not see this, he is going to have a long, hot summer. All a pilot has to do is follow the rules to a T, and this place is in big trouble. Nothing illegal, in fact just the opposite. Totally legal and above board. The way the FAA wants it done. All you have to do is operate your jet as if the FAA were in the jumpseat 24 /7, and it does not operate the way it used to. Not that I ever operated ANY other way. I see those who were on the "giver" side, now following the letter of the law in operating an airline. I really don't need to get specific about the particulars, but the west pilots absolutely understand what this means. Well, it is happening now. If you follow the letter of the law, the way it is written in airline ops. and FAR s- it can be extremely difficult to run an airline the way management is used to. They want you to carry things on, and it just is not going to happen.
I think there are enough people on both sides of this dispute that can actually agree, without name calling, that both sides have some very important arguments for their respective positions. It is just meeting at that middle ground that has to happen to then go on and beat the likes of Jerry Glass and Co. Any suggestions other than calling someone a scab or something like that?
Thank you for the response. I'm not angry about not being able to put a 17 year pilot under me who had never been furloughed. I will be angry though if USAPA trades DOH for a contract that is worse than the west's current contract. I will be especially annoyed if the courts then replace DOH with the Nic.