crazylikefox
Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 18
Deborah,C.L. Fox~
Regarding mergers and the uniquness of our situation: Never in the history of AFA or to my knowledge any other unionized group (under the RLA) has a membership been forced to work under their initial CBA for as long as the West. Never has a membership (West), been in Section 6, only to be put in recess due to a merger in order to get to a joint agreement that has gone on for 5 years. And during that 5 years have the membership (West) request to go back to Section 6 only to have management say, "we won't bargain with you here, we need to come to an agreement in joint talks.
Put on top of that, a membership (East) who has endured not one, but two bankruptices. Bankruptcies that have seen pay, benefits, work rules and pension decimated. A membership that watched as their company was being managed into the ground by those in senior executives. Those same executives that managed to save their parachutes while your pension was tossed out the window.
Now toss into the mix a process (joint negotiations) that has no avenue for self help (strike or CHAOS). Add all of those items together and you have an atmosphere that can only serve as material for a business book on "What Not To DO". Our situation is indeed unique!
I joined the JNC the last week in May. That does not shield me from the past 5 years of joint negotiations, nor does it excuse my lack of "historic" knowledge of why certain language was negotiated. To say I had to hit the ground running was a bit of an understatement. At that time the Reserve Section was all but negotiated. Except for minimum days off (which in the end was moved to the Scheduling Section), the Reserve Section was complete. I soon learned that while this section would be an improvement for West FAs (there are some who are critical of the language), I truly did not understand the level of angst there was on the East. It didn't take long for me to read and hear the disappointment of our East co-workers.
The term professional negotiators is batted around alot in our industry. Our staff negotiator is a professional negotiator who works for the JNC. Any other professional negotiator would do the same.....take direction from the committee.
It is acknowledged that I have not read the notes from your bankruptcy. I have learned by talking to other members of the MEC along with Mike and Carol. I don't want to get pulled into the debate whether their membership feels they are effective. That is not my call. I work with them. I have to have a certain level of trust in their knowledge of the history of US Air/Airways along with the history of the concessions. They have to do the same in return. We will not let them dictate what they believe the West FAs want or need, just like I can't tell them the East doesn't want to split from the pilots. When they tell us this is critical, we have to believe that is the case. That is how this works. Remember, Lisa and I are trying to represent West interests, while Carol and Mike represent East interests. In the end you hope to get to a single agreement.
Now, I've said this before and will do so again with all the respect I can lend.......when a TA is put before you, that's the time to read, weigh and then vote. Should you like it, you vote yes, should you hate it, you vote no. I don't mean to simplify this as most of you have been through this more times than me. We loose our strength when we take our "laundry" and air it publically. I can't control who we negotiate with no more than the next person. I'm sure there are times with the East JNC wants to toss me out of a window. But in the end we have to bring this membership a TA to consider. Let me say this again....we have to give you a TA to consider. If we don't get to that place, there is no way we can convince management the reasons why we (JNC) might have been right in the first place.
The only things I can promise, is to do my best and be honest and up front. I'm not a politician. There's no political gain for me, in fact, it opens me up to a lot of flack when I post on web boards. However; we are in the age of wireless communication so it's either remain silent or try to communciate even if it means getting my butt put in the perverbial sling from time to time.
Respectfully,
Deborah
DVolpe78@aol.com
I'm also on Facebook
I want to let you know that I think it admirable that you have indeed come on this board, and "put yourself on the chopping block" so to speak. And I do respect your willingness to answer the pundits. A personal thank you from me to you, and my intention was not to bash you.
I agree whole-heartedly that we, as members, must read any agreement before us in its entirety and use OUR vote to express our pleasure or disdain. We differ in our thoughts regarding professional negotiators, let's concede to each our individual opinions on that.
At some point, this will have to stop being about what the East wants and the West wants and the word "compromise" will enter the conversation. Let's face it, no one is ever 100% happy with everything. That's the art of compromise and negotiation. The ideal is to find a common ground, a give and take, where the whole is bettered.
Others here have brought up very interesting points. What we all need to remember is that we as a group must stand unified. The other side enjoys a JNC that at times appears disjointed. I am not naive and realize that you most certainly have discussed between the two sides the bottom line on what is negotiable.
The language of any contract is essential. So, may I suggest that total concentration go into it. From experience on the East, a simply change in the wording from an "or" to an "and" virtually obliterated benefits due on medical leaves and workman's Comp.
Best to you in your attempts on the JNC.