snapthis
Veteran
- Dec 23, 2009
- 4,236
- 6,907
Also filed: Case 2:13-cv-00471-ROS Document 267 Filed 11/13/13
Excerpts:
. Remedy
The appropriate remedy for a breach of a unions duty of fair representation must vary with the circumstances of the particular breach. Vaca, 386 U.S. at 195. Because the duty of fair representation is judicially created, remedies of its breach are necessarily left to judicial determination. Intl Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42, 53 (1979). Depending on the circumstances of the particular breach, the RLA contemplates resort to the usual judicial remedies of injunction and award of damages. Id. A court, seeking a remedy to match the unions wrong, has at its disposal the full panoply of tools traditionally used by courts to do justice between parties. Id.
In Bernard, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction that: (1) set aside a seniority integration agreement between the union and the carrier; (2) specified how pilot seniority would be ordered on an interim basis; and (3) directed ALPA to apply its current merger policy with the affected pilots having separate representation. 873 F.2d at 215, 217-218. Here, Plaintiffs seek relief comparable to that provided in Bernard. They ask for an order requiring USAPA to use the Nicolau Award to order East/West pilot seniority when US Airways pilots are integrated with those of American. And, to ensure that USAPA does not evade good faith compliance with that order, they ask for a declaration that the West Pilots have full party status and representation of their own choosing in process of integrating seniority with the American pilots. That will compel USAPA to do nothing more than what was agreed to in the TA. Given the history of this dispute, USAPAs lack of credibility, and its history of doing whatever it can to evade using the Nicolau Award, no other remedy will suffice.
III. CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs respectfully ask the Court to deny USAPAs motion for summary judgment.
Dated this 13th day of November, 2013.
Excerpts:
. Remedy
The appropriate remedy for a breach of a unions duty of fair representation must vary with the circumstances of the particular breach. Vaca, 386 U.S. at 195. Because the duty of fair representation is judicially created, remedies of its breach are necessarily left to judicial determination. Intl Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42, 53 (1979). Depending on the circumstances of the particular breach, the RLA contemplates resort to the usual judicial remedies of injunction and award of damages. Id. A court, seeking a remedy to match the unions wrong, has at its disposal the full panoply of tools traditionally used by courts to do justice between parties. Id.
In Bernard, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction that: (1) set aside a seniority integration agreement between the union and the carrier; (2) specified how pilot seniority would be ordered on an interim basis; and (3) directed ALPA to apply its current merger policy with the affected pilots having separate representation. 873 F.2d at 215, 217-218. Here, Plaintiffs seek relief comparable to that provided in Bernard. They ask for an order requiring USAPA to use the Nicolau Award to order East/West pilot seniority when US Airways pilots are integrated with those of American. And, to ensure that USAPA does not evade good faith compliance with that order, they ask for a declaration that the West Pilots have full party status and representation of their own choosing in process of integrating seniority with the American pilots. That will compel USAPA to do nothing more than what was agreed to in the TA. Given the history of this dispute, USAPAs lack of credibility, and its history of doing whatever it can to evade using the Nicolau Award, no other remedy will suffice.
III. CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs respectfully ask the Court to deny USAPAs motion for summary judgment.
Dated this 13th day of November, 2013.