What's new

The ax falls in PHL

This is confusing to me. If these guys were assaulted, as is alleged, then why haven't charges been filed yet? And if it's true that the hotel had video surveillance detailing the alleged assault, then please tell me how a grievance procedure will get any of these guys their jobs back. Nothing short of Johnny Cochran(R.I.P.) could get them out of this one.

There is so little time and so many doughnuts.
clancy.gif
 
'barbeetantrums' date='Feb 22 2006, 10:39 AM' post='355980']

No police charges have been filed so far.


With good reason! Word on the skreet is that two (2) TWU International "Thugs" provoked a handful of PHL Fleet Service Agents and the TWU "Thugs" proved to be weaker of body than mouth! Charges can still be filed...provocation is a crime!
 
Part six, they will get their jobs back because thats the only thing the unions know how to do...get the loosers rehired...happens all the time.

Well since you pay union dues for them to represent you seems to me that no matter how much a loser you are its good they are doing the job they are paid and legally required to do.

By the way should we get rid of public defenders and criminal defense lawyers? May have to get a amendment for that. Why don't people think before spout off.

In all fairness to 700UW, the IAM is bound by law to defend these recto-cranial inversions. They have to defend them. HOWEVER, the law doesn't define how good a lawyer they have to hire for that purpose.

What law are you referring to and at what point in process does a lawyer get involved? I take it you are referring to IAM defending their terminations.
 
You don't condemn their their actions?

You along with 700UW (who has not condemned their actions either) are despicable.
Better get your facts straight bucko:

Here is one

Another

Yet Another

Wow Another

There are four links to my previous posts condemning what happened.

Maybe you should actually read the threads before you accuse someone of something.

I will be eagerly awaiting your apology.

PS Bob, you know I do have to work.

My understanding is they were full-time TWU reps, not HP employees, but I could be wrong.
 
'PineyBob' date='Feb 22 2006, 11:09 PM' post='356209'
1. Why weren't the TWU members fired then?

Hmmmm??? Lets see:

1) TWU = Company Union!
2) US Airways C/S V.P. Anthony Mule's "Godchild = Local 580 President's kid!" Wouldn't want the kid's Dad unemployed, now would we!
3) TWU International Reps are not US Airways employees (how can US Airways fire them?)...IAM DL141 Reps are!
4) TWU's contract is extremely "Company Friendly!"

There are more reasons why TWU members weren't fired but your response is as weak as the TWU International Thugs.
(A brand Newbie?) That's cute, (and I bet you are too) I've been a member since Dec. so who cares what you think, I'm bored with you.
 
2) US Airways C/S V.P. Anthony Mule's "Godchild = Local 580 President's kid!" Wouldn't want the kid's Dad unemployed, now would we!

Pat Rezler doesn't even have a child, so your credibility is shot now. <_<

4) TWU's contract is extremely "Company Friendly!"

As "company friendly" as outsourcing field stations, cutting vacation time, not paying for first sick day...?
 
Pat Rezler doesn't even have a child, so your credibility is shot now. <_<

Maybe not one (child) that you're aware of, or one by you, but...

Remember YOU personalized this, not me! Pat who?


There's medication for "tantrums"
 
Maybe not one (child) that you're aware of, or one by you, but...

Remember YOU personalized this, not me! Pat who?


There's medication for "tantrums"

Pat Rezler is the President of TWU 580. He has no children. You cannot have a godfather for a child who does not exist.

Unfortunately, in your case, there is no medication for stupidity.
 
Better get your facts straight bucko:

Here is one

Another

Yet Another

Wow Another

There are four links to my previous posts condemning what happened.

Maybe you should actually read the threads before you accuse someone of something.

I will be eagerly awaiting your apology.

PS Bob, you know I do have to work.

My understanding is they were full-time TWU reps, not HP employees, but I could be wrong.

"Not condoning" and "condemning" are not the same thing. "Not condoning" is a feable attempt to distance yourself and the IAM from what your thug union brothers did, bucko.
 
A real man would have apologized, guess you are not a real man.
 
Why don't you be a man and say what they did was wrong and if convicted should spend a long time in jail.
 
In all fairness to 700UW, the IAM is bound by law to defend these recto-cranial inversions. They have to defend them. HOWEVER, the law doesn't define how good a lawyer they have to hire for that purpose.


Again I ask...What law are you referring to and at what point in process does a lawyer get involved? I take it you are referring to IAM defending their terminations.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top