At least you are not telling lies as Hackman did about not having the material I requsted. (That was very well played don't you think?) I do understand your reluctance to post the material for it does prove what I am saying about the "AMT" title. You played that off very "cool" Ken. I think it would be interesting to play you in a game of poker or chess for that matter. We could invite Hackman and your overzealous buddy UAL and take all their money, then get serious about the game.
As I said before UAL, Ken does not need your help, you almost blew it for him, but I'm cool. B)
Forget the "lame" question Ken I just wanted you to share what we both know with everyone else here. I see that you prefer to play on their ignorance and keep them in the dark. UAL is a prime example. You just let him keep ranting on knowing he is simply making a fool of himself for the ones that know the truth. But you know as well as I do that the ones that do know the truth will keep silent just as you did and hope for the best. All the time poor UAL is as clueless as they come and doesn’t even know it, but hey he’s on your side so that’s ok. Let me try another question:
What is your little organization going to do to turn the "AMT" title into a Certifiable Professional Title?
That should be your first step in raising the Bar for the AMT. That’s if you care to do this right.