AFA labor discussion (Work related)

[Onestep2flt]

We all get it. Actually more and more people get it more than ever. As for Cathy, I'd vote her in over Anne any day. STILL nobody can say a word as to what Anne has done on the MEC level for the membership. Not one thing. Cathy may not be the answer but in this case I'd choose the devil I don't know over the one I do know. Regardless, on the LEC and MEC level change will happen. Sometimes change isn't swift but change will happen here.

For the sake of this argument, Are there any others on the ballot besides these two? I don't know. Just seems to me that you are always are put in a position to pick the least of two evils. Truly, if this person is not the answer and the person that is there needs to go, maybe focus attention to others that may have been on the ballot. I guess that is too simplistic, but thought I would mention it.

 

[Travelpro72]

It's actually a good question. Does anyone know for sure who is on the the ballot?

 

[Snickers]

For the sake of this argument, Are there any others on the ballot besides these two? I don't know. Just seems to me that you are always are put in a position to pick the least of two evils. Truly, if this person is not the answer and the person that is there needs to go, maybe focus attention to others that may have been on the ballot. I guess that is too simplistic, but thought I would mention it.

Onestep2flt do not let the nastiness of the current leaderships postings persuade you to be afraid to vote for the candidate that you want to support. The current leadership will say nasty things about people in an obvious attempt to protect their positions. I am not sure who is going to be on the ballot, but I know already that I will use my vote to support Cathy and no one will be able to sway me otherwise.

 

[Snickers]

Forgive me because I know that this is getting a bit off of the topic, but it is really cold.....and nasty.....BUF snow, PIT snow... everywhere snow. Christmas just may be white this year!!! 😀

 

[songbirdstew]

Songbirdstew (Sarah) what a shame for you to state such lies. What makes you think that Cathy would ever need you to do anything for her. Your statement is false and you need to just deal with issues in PHL. What a shame that you would actually say such slanderous things against someone who is so caring that she would take the time to help you obviously when your own PIT LEC would not help you. Otherwise you would not have needed to call her for help. Cathy is a person of integrity who would never have asked anyone to snoop much less you. I am very disappointed in you Sarah for saying these things against her. Nuff said!!!

Mustang Sally (Teddy) what a shame that you cannot move on with your life and need to still come on these boards and lie about who you are when you are no longer even an employee of this airline. You just had your chance to come back with this recall. You chose to turn it down due to the fact that you would have to return as a new hire in all forms which meant losing your previous DOH pass riding privileges.
I am not slandering Cathy but telling the truth and since you also live in PIT, I welcome you at anytime to come to my home. You see I use yahoo for my e-mail and if you or anyone else cares, we can go back to the spring of 2008 when Cathy asked me to fly to CLT for her. At the time I e-mailed quite a few people with the question of if she had lost it by demanding my helping and owing her. It's all on my computer girlie.
However you wouldn't want proof like that. I'm sure that you would say that I set it up 2.5 years ago with those e-mails just waiting for the opportunity to get this dig in to Cathy ~~that's how out of touch you are.
Actually the person here I do feel sorry for is Cathy. She does not realise you will use her in any way as a puppet to get to try to run this union. You did a great job while you were here and honestly I had hoped you'd return but you chose not to so it's time to move on sister. Turn the light out on your career here and focus on the future. Your behaviour is embarrassing yourself.

 

[700UW]

Your totally wrong, teddy is not mustang sally, if you followed the boards you would know what her board name is, try again. Teddy is a friend of mine and she was the best union leader on the property ever, only one that Glass was afraid of, why do you think Glass conspired with Flores and others to oust Teddy?

 

[Glucose Intolerant]

Your totally wrong, teddy is not mustang sally, if you followed the boards you would know what her board name is, try again. Teddy is a friend of mine and she was the best union leader on the property ever, only one that Glass was afraid of, why do you think Glass conspired with Flores and others to oust Teddy?

Truth. Period.

 

[missthe727]

post deleted...found my answer

 

[songbirdstew]

Your totally wrong, teddy is not mustang sally, if you followed the boards you would know what her board name is, try again. Teddy is a friend of mine and she was the best union leader on the property ever, only one that Glass was afraid of, why do you think Glass conspired with Flores and others to oust Teddy?

You both think that the only name Teddy posts under is PITBull? Think again. Mustang Sally showed up in February 07 when the local election in PHL was going on and she wanted a certain person to win the office of LECP. If you notice, the only time "Sally" shows up is when there is an election and she is pushing for someone she wants to get in to office or when posting as her other avatar would not benefit her. She hates MF with a passion and I will agree that she was an excellent union leader and was hoping she'd come back when recalled. From what I understand, she is not due to the fact that she would lose her previous hire date for pass riding. Those who took the buy out come back as brand new hires in every way including pass riding seniority which she chose not to give up and I don't blame her.

As for the subject at hand, you cannot use the argument that people can only have one user name/avatar on this board because there are plenty that have more than one-----or even two. There is a way around that business and if you study how a person posts and how the next person responds you see a pattern in how they compose their messages. It's often comical here sometimes seeing people post under one name and then post again later to answer themselves just to get their point across. It's like watching Dr. Jekyl agree with Mr. Hyde. So, Ride Sally Ride.

 

[MustangSally]

Songbirdstew: [
You should go back and read your very first post. You stated that she called you on the phone so for you to actually believe that just because you say that you wrote others emails asking them anything should make anyone believe you....... You have got to be kidding me. That does not prove anything. You are only spreading lies about someone who took the time to help you with an issue that your own LEC must have not been able to resolve. Then the way you repay someone for helping you is by trashing them. Please! You should want to help someone who has voluntarily helped you! That does not reflect someone who really has good morals and values. 🙄

 

[MustangSally]

You both think that the only name Teddy posts under is PITBull? Think again. Mustang Sally showed up in February 07 when the local election in PHL was going on and she wanted a certain person to win the office of LECP. If you notice, the only time "Sally" shows up is when there is an election and she is pushing for someone she wants to get in to office or when posting as her other avatar would not benefit her. She hates MF with a passion and I will agree that she was an excellent union leader and was hoping she'd come back when recalled. From what I understand, she is not due to the fact that she would lose her previous hire date for pass riding. Those who took the buy out come back as brand new hires in every way including pass riding seniority which she chose not to give up and I don't blame her.

As for the subject at hand, you cannot use the argument that people can only have one user name/avatar on this board because there are plenty that have more than one-----or even two. There is a way around that business and if you study how a person posts and how the next person responds you see a pattern in how they compose their messages. It's often comical here sometimes seeing people post under one name and then post again later to answer themselves just to get their point across. It's like watching Dr. Jekyl agree with Mr. Hyde. So, Ride Sally Ride.

LOL!!!! B)

 

[songbirdstew]

Songbirdstew: [
You should go back and read your very first post. You stated that she called you on the phone so for you to actually believe that just because you say that you wrote others emails asking them anything should make anyone believe you....... You have got to be kidding me. That does not prove anything. You are only spreading lies about someone who took the time to help you with an issue that your own LEC must have not been able to resolve. Then the way you repay someone for helping you is by trashing them. Please! You should want to help someone who has voluntarily helped you! That does not reflect someone who really has good morals and values. 🙄

I did not take my issue to my own LEC because I heard that RSVs in CLT were dealing with the same problem I was having so someone suggested I contact Cathy. I am not trashing her, just telling the truth and would take a lie detector test to prove it. For people to make a decision on who to vote for, they should be told all the facts and this event is a FACT.

Ask Cathy if she was not asked to stay out of the local office. Ask Cathy if she was not removed from her RSV chair position. Did you ask Cathy if she remembers our conversation when she told me I "owed" her? As I said previously --if she says no then she is the one that is lying.

THEN ask yourself why you need her to get in to office so badly. Why is this so important to you that you continue to come on here and call me a liar ? Your personal vendetta is frightening. It's time to move on.

 

[flybynite]

I think Songbird has made a very good point. Which everyone seems to be missing. She helped her out of the "kindness of her heart" and then got nasty when Songbird wouldn't go sneaking around for her.

Now that's just creepy as hell.

Why would anyone want someone in our AFA office that is so scanky?

 

[songbirdstew]

I think Songbird has made a very good point. Which everyone seems to be missing. She helped her out of the "kindness of her heart" and then got nasty when Songbird wouldn't go sneaking around for her.

Now that's just creepy as hell.

Why would anyone want someone in our AFA office that is so scanky?

Thank you for believing me. As "Sally" stated, I am not based in CLT so I don't even get a vote BUT I think folks there should be aware of potential problems if they elect her to office. There aleady is enough instability in AFA, do they want someone like her in office ? If that is who they choose then good luck to them.

 

[Career Reserve]

Why would anyone want someone in our AFA office that is so scanky?

Skank is already in AFA!
It's been there for quite some time. Time to clean out the offices.