freedom
Veteran
- Feb 15, 2006
- 3,244
- 274
Getting a better contract should hinge on Traditonal Negotiations... not a Transition Agreement.
{so on and so forth }
Don't let 'em rape you!!! Vote NO.
I somewhat disagree with you bag chucker
1st you make the point about traditional talk , well traditionally talks take a very long time do they not ? What’s the average for these talks , at least what two years right ? How long have we been at this for now , so we’re going to wait till 2010 to really start making some headway ? A big no thanks over here .
I agree with your second point , it’s not yet possible to say how costly this will be to our brothers on the east who get cut with the 60 day rule .
I disagree that our contract has effective scope protection , I think there’s very little in either contract that will stop the slaughter , as far as the east contract goes , with the new TA their scope actually improves .. But that’s not really a big issue for us .
As for there being good reasons and bad reasons , I see more good than bad … your in a very bad position , so I can see how you notice the bad . Overall and in general , considering the state of the world today I think it’s better to go the safer route than the riskier one .