traderjake said:
LOL. Fair enough Jake, and you obviously, already know I was merely joking with you about such. 🙂
traderjake said:
Reed Richards said:[SIZE=14pt]He seems to despise those that have actually run or held office...[/SIZE]
CM jumps in front of every mob migration and then thinks he is a leader, and some folks actually give him credit.EastUS1 said:"and the recall ensured a vote on the MOU" is pure projection on your part, and if what you claim is true, in any case evades the very reasonable thought that perhaps more could've well been had without your little sabotage efforts. I've never known of CM doing anything more than enthusiastically groveling and licking the floor for any unswept crumbs before, so why's this such a great "victory", even if it went as you say? No matter now, I suppose. Umm..so I must now assume I'll not receive an invitation to the wedding then? 🙂
traderjake said:
..... so you could try to put a Reserve F/O ahead of a Captain on the same airplane.
[SIZE=10.5pt]He brings that argument up every time, it is a red herring. We all know that the job of fences and restrictions is to prevent that scenario. Our 17 year guy had 17 years unbroken service, his DOH was in fact his longevity, just as the new hire at AWA had no furlough. He despises us for fighting the award, and thus denying him a pay raise, yet sits smugly enjoying the benefits of what his own father and Boeing Boy allowed to happen to the Empire guys. All his arguments are muddied by his own silence at what PI did. Just like Boeing Boy and this father, he has never presented so much as a resolution, much less run for office with the intent of repairing that wrong. And of course he will use the excuse it was too late. [/SIZE]EastUS1 said:
Ummm....Wouldn't that be the exact effect to be had from putting the nic into play now? 😉
The Nic does not disappear until it is incorporated into the combined AMR/LCC list to form the list for the new AAL pilot roster.robbedagain said:When does that nic disappear also when will the aa n us east n west begin ur integration process
I have to call you on this one RR. He wasn't a product of nepotism, at least not completely. He is just a little junior to me and when I got hired PI had an anti-nepotism policy. You could not work under the same VP as your parent. It changed after I got hired, so maybe that's when TJ got hired, a lot of pilots kids did, or his father had retired. Either way, PI didn't give anyone a job. Their attitude was we want a good employee first, and then we can make them a good pilot. If we get one of the rare ones that has made it this far an we can't make them a good pilot, we will get rid of them on probation. They fired a long time F/A son about the time I was hired. If PI had a good employee and they recommended some one, that was golden with them. Did they put too much weight on that? I don't know. Sure some slipped by, but they had a great airline with one of the most loyal employee groups ever.Reed Richards said:[SIZE=14pt] I find it strange that the most vocal anti USAPA, pro NIC pilot on this forum was a product of nepotism (good for him.) RR[/SIZE]
That's not what the MOU says. It was a product of the TA and we amended the TA then it goes poof at POR.nic4us said:The Nic does not disappear until it is incorporated into the combined AMR/LCC list to form the list for the new AAL pilot roster.
The integration will begin by establishing an integration protocol within 30 days of the effective date. Further, if no solution is agreed upon within 90 days of the effective date we go to arbitration, which will begin once there is a JCBA
Way too much on a simple aside. The guy acts like a horse's rear end here on this forum, he does not merit your defense on any matter. Just calling it as I see it. RRPi brat said:I have to call you on this one RR. He wasn't a product of nepotism, at least not completely. He is just a little junior to me and when I got hired PI had an anti-nepotism policy. You could not work under the same VP as your parent. It changed after I got hired, so maybe that's when TJ got hired, a lot of pilots kids did, or his father had retired. Either way, PI didn't give anyone a job. Their attitude was we want a good employee first, and then we can make them a good pilot. If we get one of the rare ones that has made it this far an we can't make them a good pilot, we will get rid of them on probation. They fired a long time F/A son about the time I was hired. If PI had a good employee and they recommended some one, that was golden with them. Did they put too much weight on that? I don't know. Sure some slipped by, but they had a great airline with one of the most loyal employee groups ever.
TJ was qualified, I believe he had been flying a 707 or DC-8. I've flown with him and had no problem with his flying ability. He went out of his way to look after the F/As. That shouldn't be an issue with him.
I believe it was nepotism on the northern side of the fence that caused the company to lose an EEOC case, where they hired a pilot that didn't meet their qualifications, but turned down two African-American pilots that did. I may be off, it's been a long time, but that's the way I remember it.
All that said, I have issues with TJ. I don't get him. He has never changed his tune about his ideas of SLI integration as some have, but IMHO they were as screwed up in 2005 as they are now! He seems to see no value in his career, the time he has invested and the sacrifices he has made. When I read his posts visions of Wayne's World pop into my head, "We're not worthy, we're not worthy!" How any east pilot could hold up the Nic is beyond me.
Just calling it as I see it.
Can you point out in the MOU where it specifically says the Nic is no longer a consideration, or more to the point, exactly where in the MOU it says the West pilot class or any LCC pilot for that matter, waive there right to the Nic?Pi brat said:That's not what the MOU says. It was a product of the TA and we amended the TA then it goes poof at POR.
Speaking of too much info, we can sum the east position very succinctly.Reed Richards said:Way too much on a simple aside. The guy acts like a horse's rear end here on this forum, he does not merit your defense on any matter. Just calling it as I see it. RR
I disagree. No one is all good or all bad. Well, maybe a few, but you get the point.Reed Richards said:Way too much on a simple aside. The guy acts like a horse's rear end here on this forum, he does not merit your defense on any matter. Just calling it as I see it. RR
I think it's pretty clear. I think the testimony of Ken Holmes makes it even more clear. I will never convince you and you will never convince me. Your use of the word scab make you and your opinion pretty much worthless.nic4us said:Can you point out in the MOU where it specifically says the Nic is no longer a consideration, or more to the point, exactly where in the MOU it says the West pilot class or any LCC pilot for that matter, waive there right to the Nic?
The MOU is not a "waiver" of the legal rights of the pilot group to demand implementation and use of the arbitrated award.
My best prediction is, the outcome of the MB process will incorporate the Nic, whether the panel says they used it or not, and that the order of LCC pilots within the order of the total AAL pilots will not change one pilots position.