H
HottootrotNyc
Guest
you know, I can actually sit here and think about what you have posted and see where you are coming from..yes, its difficult to think about working so many years for a company and then they decide to merger and all these new people are coming in ahead of me.. yeah it seems like its not fair... but its quite one thing to actually think about how unfair it may be and then..
actually doing it, like..stapling someone to the bottom of a list!
unless they have the ability to build a time machine and go back to the Roaring 1920's.. none of us are working for the "original company" the airline industry is a series of mergers and acquisitions since way back then to present day.
(know what Im saying)
and no one deserves to lose all their seniority because of the decision of top management either.
(you know since when do they ever ask us if its ok to merge?)
usually you find out they have merged on the six-o-clock news!
this sort of how I look at it, if they are looking out for the interest of all the union members, that would also include those from the other group who will also become a member of that union when all is said and done. they are not to be two separate groups if both groups are to be integrated.. so if a line is used, we are protecting the members, they need to do just that..
all of them, current and those who will be joining the fold as well..
(especially if they are requiring the new people to pay dues)
you know..
Life is not fair, that is why you always want to try to be fair, when you absolutely have the ability to make it that way.
(for everyone)
Well this is where a lot of people seem to misunderstand, this was not a merger in anyway shape or form. This was not like NWA and Delta agreeing to join and make a great airline. It was AA buying what was left of a dead company. AMR could of saved themselves lots of money and time by just hiring off the street and dropping every single TWA employee. They had that ability, BUT didn't. Sorry to say but I bet they wish they did, it would of saved them probably a few billion in operating costs.
As for thinking something and doing something, if we were talking about murder then I would agree with you but we are not. We are talking about what is fair for the employees of the purchasing company and what they felt was the right course to protect all of the AA F/A's on AA's seniority list. The TWA people were not APFA members and were not of concern, AA F/A's were. They were only members after what was decided to do with them, so if the TWA F/A's have any grief it should be with TWA and then the IAM. In all reality TWA was the company that sold all of it's employees up the river many moons ago.
As for the "original company", what I was referring to was a person being hired at AA and another at TWA, no matter what the time period is or was. I don't care what had been done in the past to form each airline, only the present matters. Also each situation is different, some are mergers and some are not.
Frontier went out of business and PE purchased them after they already closed shop, they gave the Frontier F/A's full seniority. The PE people had no say in it and were not happy and would of gladly had them place under them as the new hires they were. When CO bought PE, they were not given full seniority and that was fair. PE was broke and about to close up shop and basically got lucky. They are very senior F/A's today.
As for asking us about merger's and purchasing assets, never said they would come and ask us. What they should do is step out of the way and allow the work groups hash out what they think would be a fair shake. NWA+DL= Merger, DOH, seniority for all F/A's, AA+TWA=Asset purchase, F/A's were part of the purchasing deal and APFA and all of AA F/A's felt they didn't deserve full DOH and that was what was decided.
As you stated, life isn't fair, you win some and you lose some. While this was a loss for TWA it was a major victory for AA and being able to protect it's nAAtives.