Nov/Dec 2013 Pilot Discussion

[Res Judicata]

I have to admit, #6 above is pretty funny. Who are these reliable people?

If USCABA was even remotely an actual "Trade Union" then I would agree. It's not. It's an organized crime unit owned and operated by a bunch of angry, aged failures whose Narcissistic Personality Disorder...aka, Cleary syndrome, has paralyzed them and caused the permanent devaluation of a life's career earnings. They have purposefully wrecked about 30% of an average career span for over 5000 pilots. They didn't mention the over 1 billion dollar price tag to chase the DOH unicorn back in '08 did they?

There's really only one effective way to deal with a Bully. You knock his teeth out on the playground. Just like AOL did in the Courtroom.

 

[Pi brat]

There's really only one effective way to deal with a Bully. You knock his teeth out on the playground. Just like AOL did in the Courtroom.

Judge Silver has ruled? What does it say?

 

[snapthis]

If USCABA was even remotely an actual "Trade Union" then I would agree. It's not. It's an organized crime unit owned and operated by a bunch of angry, aged failures whose Narcissistic Personality Disorder...aka, Cleary syndrome, has paralyzed them and caused the permanent devaluation of a life's career earnings. They have purposefully wrecked about 30% of an average career span for over 5000 pilots. They didn't mention the over 1 billion dollar price tag to chase the DOH unicorn back in '08 did they?
There's really only one effective way to deal with a Bully. You knock his teeth out on the playground. Just like AOL did in the Courtroom.

The school yard bully.
Too bad we can solve the problems that way anymore.

 

[Res Judicata]

The school yard bully.
Too bad we can solve the problems that way anymore.

True. However I guess we could always "dogfight" as offered by the blathering scab drunk that frequents these boards.

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

True. However I guess we could always "dogfight" as offered by the blathering scab drunk that frequents these boards.

Well you probably have that down on your video games but remember for a resume that "PIC" time
is not real!

 

[Claxon]

If USCABA was even remotely an actual "Trade Union" then I would agree. It's not. It's an organized crime unit owned and operated by a bunch of angry, aged failures whose Narcissistic Personality Disorder...aka, Cleary syndrome, has paralyzed them and caused the permanent devaluation of a life's career earnings. They have purposefully wrecked about 30% of an average career span for over 5000 pilots. They didn't mention the over 1 billion dollar price tag to chase the DOH unicorn back in '08 did they?
There's really only one effective way to deal with a Bully. You knock his teeth out on the playground. Just like AOL did in the Courtroom.

No, she didn't. Res is a liar with a bad temper. That is why the FBI polygraph expert launched him. They knew he would have a kid he thought was stealing twinkles shot full of holes.
Smart move. Now he may be AA s problem child.

 

[Phoenix]

Hippacrite? For some reason I can't find that in the dictionary.
 
What are you, some illiterate drop-out tagger playing on the aviation forums?
 
Ring-ring that's your probation officer calling.
 
Loser.

Yeah, he definately struck a sore note for ya'. You made that clear!

 

[EastUS1]

True. However I guess we could always "dogfight" as offered by the blathering scab drunk that frequents these boards.

 
I guess we could indeed. I'd always thought it would be good grins for any supposed pilots, and I don't honestly understand your aversion to such. Well...but even some recreational sport flying would require your upping your ante a bit from just being some internet-tough-guy-punk, and I certainly won't hold my breath for that ever happening. Per cactusboy53: "This is sparta!....I'll let the courts do my talking for me!"
 
Res Judicata: "You knock his teeth out on the playground."...? Sure thing kid. Sigh!...Kindly spare us all, mighty "spartan". 😉

 

[Res Judicata]

No, she didn't. Res is a liar with a bad temper. That is why the FBI polygraph expert launched him. They knew he would have a kid he thought was stealing twinkles shot full of holes.
Smart move. Now he may be AA s problem child.

Who am I supposed to be again? I forgot.

 

[EastUS1]

Who am I supposed to be again? I forgot.

 
I can't express any honest surprise there. It must be tough keeping it straight as to whether "you'se" are "spartans", "soldiers" in some supposed "army", "knights" or "wizards" or..well whatever, at any given moment. 🙂
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7lgU3J5seA&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PL21C1C7D32B996827

 

[EastUS1]

Sure, I'll expand on it a bit. Seeing that there are various forms of terrorism which includes the workplace, I'd call the RICO suit against West pilots terrorism. Psychological terrorism.....................................................................

I think that would describe an Usapian.

Does that answer your question? 😉

 
Not entirely: "For that matter; care to take an additional stab at the whole "spartan" and being supposed "soldiers" in some "army" fantasies? Good luck."....?
 
As devoted lawyer-lovers; "you'se" must necessarily be aware of the value of testimony from witnesses with demonstrably diminished capacity..and here we have a whole group of supposed adults fantasizing themselves "spartans" and "soldiers"....? Note that in a generous spirit; I didn't request reasonable explanation for the "dire wolves", "knights" who've "fought many battles" with "valor", or even the "lords and ladies" bits, as I can't possibly imagine you having any to offer. 🙂
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT8H9smpK3U&feature=c4-overview-vl&list=PL5DCDEE4D2ADA2659

 

[snapthis]

 
Not entirely: "For that matter; care to take an additional stab at the whole "spartan" and being supposed "soldiers" in some "army" fantasies? Good luck."....?
 
As devoted lawyer-lovers; "you'se" must necessarily be aware of the value of testimony from witnesses with demonstrably diminished capacity..and here we have a whole group of supposed adults fantasizing themselves "spartans" and "soldiers"....? Note that in a generous spirit; I didn't request reasonable explanation for the "dire wolves", "knights" who've "fought many battles" with "valor", or even the "lords and ladies" bits, as I can't possibly imagine you having any to offer. 🙂
 
 

 
Nuts.
 
You've outdone Psy......and Claxon.
 
Congrats  🙂
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yFyy-n27cQ

 

[snapthis]

Who am I supposed to be again? I forgot.

 
They need a "trigger" to remember.

 

[EastUS1]

 
Nuts.
 
You've outdone Psy......and Claxon.
 
Congrats  🙂
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yFyy-n27cQ

 
"Nuts"...? I've insufficiently childish imagination to ever fantasize myself to be even the slightest semblance of a Spartan, much less some "knight" covered in "valor" from "many battles". (I feel it best to leave the little "Larry Potta" business to it's own special category.)  Your group's mileage clearly varies. 😉
 
"Note that in a generous spirit; I didn't request reasonable explanation for the "dire wolves", "knights" who've "fought many battles" with "valor", or even the "lords and ladies" bits, as I can't possibly imagine you having any to offer." I rest my case. Grow Up...An admittedly futile suggestion.

 

[Claxon]

west claimed warrior status, now they claim victim.  USAPA's side of the story.
 
"What plaintiffs appear to be complaining about is that the final MOU makes
this position even clearer, and hence undercuts their “Nicolau by sneak attack” strategy,
that is, their plan to urge approval of a “neutral” MOU and then to claim that the MOU
requires implementation of the Nicolau Award. Ex. 308, 310, 258 and 259.
Plaintiffs appear to believe that they would have succeeded on their claim that the
MOU was the “single agreement” referred to in the TA “but for” ¶10.h. Nothing could
be further from the truth, for, as shown above, that was never the parties’ agreement or
intent nor could the MOU qualify as the “Single Agreement” referred to in the TA. But,
having had their argument that the Nicolau Award is somehow a part of the MOU
negated, plaintiffs now attack USAPA for including the clarification and foiling their
schemes. However, Plaintiffs’ “Nicolau by default” claim is as meritless with respect to
the earlier draft “MOU I” as it is now under the final MOU."
 
http://leonidas.cactuspilots.us/West_Pilot_DFR_DJ/Doc_264_USAPA%27s_Response.pdf