So who's non rev. policy will survive?

I like the first come, first serve (FCFS) because it would be easier to plan knowing where you are on the list w/o somebody with more seniority walking up and bump you. (I do have 25 yrs)
 
Considering that many of you started when the earth was first created , I'm in favor of your non rev policy.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #7
For one who has lived under both. (TWA's (senority) and AA's (first come) I feel AA's is the fairer of he two!
 
I like the first come first serve. We go by doh. I have 25 years and get on most flights, but it's not fair to someone who has been waiting all day and I walk up and get on the flight.
 
As a 26 year AA employee I favor check in time.. The last thing I want to so is spend 10 or more hours on a plane from overseas to be bumped by someone who got hired the day before me and left thier house an hour ago
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #10
Let's carry this one step further. Which policy do you all feel will be in effect after the dust settels? And I will it be an issue?
 
I thought it was impossible to nonrev with high load factors?...

If I had to guess, neither side is going to want to change how they do it. If I recall, CO gave up time of check-in to move to UA's seniority system.

Personally, I think it's a mistake to go with seniority. It perpetuates the entitlement culture that some employees have.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top